Back to Main Page
A Letter to the Editor by Bart Olson - published in
various Sauk County newspapers in the week of December 1, 2004:
Letter to the editor
It has come to my attention that the Sauk County Communications Infrastructure
Committee (CIC) is attempting to exempt itself (the county) from the county's
own Tower Siting Ordinance (Chapter 23). As some of you may know, I was a
supervisor from 1996-2000 and served on the planning and zoning committee and
also a special committee that studied communication towers and drafted
legislation that eventually became Sauk County's Tower Siting Ordinance, which
was adopted on July 20, 1999.
The primary reason the county revised its policy on communication towers in
1999 was due to public pressure to limit the growth of towers as they are
unattractive and tend to devalue surrounding property values especially homes
and residential lots. We tried to resolve the issue in three ways:
1. Not allowing new towers if an existing tower space can be rented by the
applicant. No tower could be applied for unless the applicant had proved
adequate space was not available on existing facilities.
2. A tower had to be set back at least five times the height of the tower from
an adjoining property line. An applicant could obtain a waiver from adjacent
property owners if he wished. It was assumed a waiver would cost about as much
as the loss of value to the adjoining owners' property.
3. New towers would have to be built strong enough to handle at least three
additional new users.
Since then the ordinance has been amended twice: In December 1999 (23.03) to
prevent townships from enacting their own ordinances and in February 2000
(23.04d) to exempt State of Wisconsin towers, and (28.08(2)) to reduce the
distance from adjacent properties to two times the tower height instead of 5
times.
In my opinion, the original ordinance has been just about gutted due to
changes over the years but this latest move by the CIC will totally make a
complete joke of it. Just put yourself in the shoes of someone who owns a home
or building lot and then the county builds its own tower next door and the
value of your property drops to half or even less and there is nothing you can
do about it. So much for protecting the citizens of Sauk County.
In my opinion, the CIC has gone from a committee that was appointed to replace
the current county communications system in the most cost effective way to a
committee bent on putting the county into the communications business, i.e.
tower rental, fiber transport, telephone service and possibly wireless
internet service. On September 21, 2004 according to the county's web site
CIC's consultant proposed a $62 million dollar wireless internet system
featuring 8,400 antennas to the CIC for them to consider. Imagine county
taxpayers footing the bill for a $62 million dollar internet system with 8,400
antennas. Are these guys out of control or what?
The county does not need to build and own all of its towers. If communication
towers or municipal water towers are available to attach antennas to, the
county should use them. Rented tower space works just as well as placing an
antenna on your own tower but it is a lot cheaper. Interconnecting the towers
with telephone lines is also substantially cheaper than plowing in and
maintaining your own $3 million dollar fiber optic network. The Village of
Merrimac has offered the county space on their water tower but I suspect the
county doesn't want to do that because they want to be in the tower rental
business throughout the county themselves and in direct competition with all
the municipalities who have towers.
The CIC wants to exempt the county from the tower ordinance otherwise they
will probably have to attach some of their antennas to someone else's tower or
may have to pay some poor Sauk County property owner for a waiver in order to
construct a new tower.
The county should not be exempted from its own ordinance; it should play by
its own rules. It's not fair to the adjacent property owners who will not be
compensated for their losses, the other private and municipal tower owners who
have to compete with the county for customers or the citizens who originally
complained about too many towers ruining the Sauk County skyline. The CIC
should get back to focusing on fixing the county's radio system and stop
trying to get county taxpayers to foot the bill for an expensive and
potentially illegal big government adventure in various communications
businesses.
Sincerely,
Bart Olson
Merrimac